Showing posts with label Coupes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Coupes. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

2013 Porsche 911 Turbo S



The 911 Turbo S is blindingly fast. I mean that not as afigure of speech, but quite literally. This car blinds you. Human eyes cannot cope with the sheer force of detonating from a standstill past 60mph in three seconds, the Turbo S flinging itself off the line with a lot of noise and just a hint of wheelspin. Clench your jaw, squint, gurn, it's all useless: as launch control bites, the windscreen starts to swim, the scenery closes in around you, and then, for what must be no more than a few milliseconds but feels far longer, all is a blur as the g-force squeezes your eyeballs' vital fluids in directions vital eyeball fluids shouldn't go. It is addictive and unsettling, not acceleration in the traditional sense, but something rawer: thrust, the sensation of a jet aeroplane on take-off, a relentless surge seemingly independent of tarmac and tyres.

Ease off the throttle, and the world wobbles back into view. It's official: the 911 Turbo S is too fast for eyes. Not a bad boast for the machine with a strong claim to the crown of Quickest Car in the Real World. Sure, the record books may herald the Bugatti Veyron and its 267mph top speed, the Pagani Huayra and BAC Mono may sit atop the TGTV Power Laps board. And, true, on an empty track or airstrip in the hands of His Stigness, these three might edge out the Turbo S. But on the road? The Veyron, astonishing achievement though it is, is too large, too heavy, too damn intimidating to use on normal public lanes. The rear-drive Huayra and Mono, meanwhile, require a driver of superhuman skill to exploit their full potential if the tarmac is anything other than bone-dry and perfectly smooth. If we're talking a real, normal driver on a real, normal road, I'm not sure there's anything on earth to touch this rear-engined slot car.

Some numbers. The new Turbo S, with its bi-turbo 3.8-litre flat-six, sends 553bhp and a ludicrous 553 torques to four very large tyres. That's some 30bhp and 37lb ft more than the last-gen 911 Turbo S, which few regarded as underpowered or slow. The new car's 0-62mph time is officially quoted at 3.1 seconds, which is frankly silly for something with at least a nominal set of rear seats and a decent front boot. Yet our unofficial stopwatch tests suggest the Turbo S might even be a couple of tenths quicker than that. Quick enough to cause temporary ocular disability, at least.

To some extent, liberating a lump of extra power and pace with the aid of a couple of turbos is the easy bit. And a company less engineering-obsessed than Porsche might be content with that alone: no doubt the chassis of the standard 911 Carrera 4S is competent enough to deal with 553bhp and whatever treatment any Turbo S owner might throw at it.

But Porsche doesn't think like that. Porsche, being Porsche, has entirely re-engineered the 911 for Turbo duty. For a start, take a look at that big ol' booty. The Turbo S's rear track is some seven centimetres wider than that of the standard rear-drive 911 Carrera, and 15cm wider than its own front track. This is fine news for grip, but means that no matter how neatly you reverse-park your Turbo S in a supermarket space, it'll always look a bit wonky.

Like the new 911 GT3, the Turbo S employs rear-wheel steer, electromechanical actuators angling the rear wheels some 1.5 degrees either way: against the fronts below 31mph to reduce the turning circle and increase agility; or with the fronts over 50mph for better stability. And it works. Unlike rear-steer systems of old, you get no impression of it doing its thing, only of a car with astonishing high-speed poise. Does it increase manoeuvrability under 31mph? Couldn't tell you. The Turbo S rarely spends more than two or three milliseconds below 31mph at any time.

There's clever aero too. As well as that fat rear wing - which pops up at 75mph and, in Sport Plus mode, angles seven degrees forward for extra downforce - the Turbo S boasts the world's first variable front spoiler, a four-inch-deep rubber skirt (stop it) that extends from the bottom lip of the front bumper in three sections. At low speeds, it remains retracted, its side sections only unfurling as you pass 75mph. But in track-attack mode, the spoiler is fully extended, for both maximum downforce and maximum usefulness as a driveway snow shovel, come winter.

Porsche says the rear wing and front splitter add 132kg of downforce, which sounds mighty impressive until you learn you have to hit 186mph to generate that figure. Perhaps more telling is that the rubbery skirt cuts around two seconds from the Turbo S's Nürburgring lap time, which stands at 7m27s on standard production tyres. That's faster than a Carrera GT, a time no doubt aided by the Turbo S's monster, standard, carbon-ceramic brakes, which measure 410mm diameter up front and 390mm at the rear.

What this newness adds up to, predictably, is simply ludicrous speed, everywhere, all of the time. Autobahn, B-road, gravel, rain... no matter - the Turbo S is the sort of car you step from after a drive, even a short one, thankful to still possess your licence. It's the sort of car I'd be scared to own for fear it might rewire my concept of what's physically and socially acceptable on the road. Perhaps ironically, the safety net of that four-wheel-drive system makes it somehow scarier: this isn't a car that'll warn you when it's about to go very, very wrong. The first time you lost it would be very big, and it would be your last. Traction traction traction and oops missed the corner and ah look I'm doing 200mph sideways and now I am on fire.

What a drivetrain, though. No, the turbo six doesn't scream like a Ferrari V8, but has a unique soundtrack all of its own: a bassy, phasing hum at idle, like something from a Seventies sci-fi series, morphing into a barrage of cannon-fire exhaust as you thump up through the gears. Such is the flat-six's flexibility that on any A- or B-road you never need change out of third, a wrecking ball of a gear that carries you from walking pace into triple figures incurring only minor blindness along the way. Not that changing gear is a chore: now Porsche has ditched the daft push-me-pull-you buttons from its double-clutch gearbox - replacing them with conventional right-for-up-left-for-down paddles - this 7spd PDK is just about the best in the business, capable of smooth anonymity or punchy, instant changes, depending on your mien. In the naturally aspirated, rear-drive 911 GT3, we might bemoan the lack of a manual gearbox, but PDK is a perfect fit for the Turbo S's ‘keep it pointing in the right direction, and we'll sort out the rest' philosophy.

That said, if you're thinking the GT3 is the hardcore sports-thing and the Turbo S the loping cruiser, don't be fooled: this is no softie. True, you wouldn't want a car with any hint of vagueness when you're cracking 190mph on the autobahn, and even on Germany's ropiest roads, the ride remains the right side of acceptable, but it's an unyielding bugger nonetheless.

Talking of acceptable, Porsche is extremely keen to highlight the eco credentials of the new Turbo S, pointing to economy of 29mpg and CO2 emissions of 227g/km. These are, indeed, impressive figures for a 553bhp supercar, but the anti-petrolists, we suspect, will find plenty else about the Turbo S to rail against. Like its 198mph top speed.

For us pro-petrolists, however, what is there to complain of? Not much. So the Turbo doesn't offer much in the way of fingertip feedback, but that's not what it's about: the 911 GT3 is there for those who want to explore slip angles and Nomex outerwear. Perhaps the biggest issue is the price: the 911 Turbo S starts at £140,000, which sounds rather a lot for a hopped-up VW Beetle. Or does it? On power, pace and pub stats, the Turbo S looks decent value alongside the supercars it'll match for pace, not least the Ferrari 458 and McLaren 12C, both of which Porsche benchmarked for performance.

Of course, if all you want is fast and four-wheel drive, critics will point out the Turbo S is nigh-on double the price of the 543bhp Nissan GT-R, perhaps the only other car that can really rival it for devastating, everyday pace and immutable traction. But the Turbo S is a more complete, rounded proposition: perhaps the ultimate everyday supercar. Your eyes may disagree.

Sam Philip

The numbers
3800cc, 6cyl, 4WD, 553bhp, 553 lb ft, 29.0mpg, 227g/km CO2, 0-62 in 3.1secs, 198mph, 1605kg, from £140,852

The verdict
Like all the best things in life, likely to turn you blind if you use it too much. New Turbo S is appallingly, brilliantly quick.

Nissan GT-R 2013




Another six months, another subtle tweak to the GT-R, another feeling that if you buy one, you're simply beta-testing for the next generation. Which will be along in a minute.


For model year 2013, Nissan's big hitter is still a 3.8-litre bi-turbo V6, but tweaked for increased responsiveness in the mid and upper rev ranges, the body is slightly more rigid than before, and the suspension has been tampered with for a better ride and more stability at high speed. The physical changes are gloriously tiny micro-engineering pornography, and include new injectors, a new pressure release valve for the turbos to help keep them on song, new oil-pan baffles, and revised spring and damper rates. The dash has been reinforced, as has the instrument panel, and there are even new cam bolts. Honestly.


Surprisingly, you can actually feel the differences. It rides noticeably better - especially at low speed in town - and seems to be less aggressive in the boost application, but no less fast. It still makes mincemeat of any traction situation (0-62mph is down to 2.7 seconds - down 0.1), and launches like it's been hit by a truck. It's brilliant, it's better, it's worth it. But only just.

Tom Ford

The numbers

3799cc, V6, 4WD, 542bhp 465lb ft, 24mpg, 275g/km CO2, 0-62mph in 2.7secs, 196mph, 1740kg

The verdict

Tiny changes make the 2013 version of the GT-R a tiny bit better. Not a revolution, but worth it.

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

2013 Audi RS5



Enthusiast drivers tend to be a greedy lot. Always in pursuit of the next great thing, with just a little more oomph, they are never happy. In the process, many participate in bench-racing, a form of verbal histrionics where they try to show whose car is equipped with the biggest stones.

Apparently some of the brass at Volkswagen Group’s Audi unit felt the need to show off some “brass” of their own.

The result is the 2013 Audi RS 5.

Newly available on these shores, the RS 5 has been enjoyed by those stiffs on the Old Continent for several years. Fitted with more, more, more of everything, it returns in one of the sexiest packages in the sport coupe segment. More powerful than its pedestrian relatives, the A- and S 5, the RS 5 improves on their offerings by going a lot further.

What is it? 
Recently tagged by collectible car insurer Hagerty Insurance as one of its Top Future Collectible cars, the 2013 Audi RS 5 Coupe is a four-seater that offers speed, handling, and style in a luxury package. Instead of the standard 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder of the A5, or 3.0-liter, six-pot supercharged engine in the S5, the RS 5 is motivated by Audi’s 4.2-liter naturally-aspirated V8, which produces 450 horsepower at a sky high 8,250 rpm and 317 lb-ft of torque at a mid-ranged 4,000 rpm. Since 2011, that engine has been based on the Audi V10 found in the R8 supercar, with two of the ten cylinders eliminated

The familiar quattro all-wheel-drive system is also on board mated this time to a seven-speed Audi S Tronic dual-clutch transmission that allows shifting with the lever or steering wheel-mounted paddle shift levers. Power is delivered to quattro's new crown gear center differential, with a starting front/rear bias of 40:60. If needed, up to 70 percent of torque can be delivered up front or 80 percent to the rear. The new system is also optimized for Audi’s electronic torque vectoring. For those seeking a do it yourself gearbox, your time is wasted here: no manual transmission is offered. For the six-speed manual transmission, buyers will have to opt for the 333 horsepower Audi S5.

Although our RS 5’s brakes with their eight piston calipers and drilled rotors were nothing to sneeze at, the package can be upgraded with a carbon ceramic front brake kit that carries with it, a tariff of $6,000. Regardless, this Audi is not about dilly-dallying.

What's it up against? 
The personal/executive muscle segment is not lacking in players here. The RS 5 is joined by Cadillac’s CTS-V Coupe, Mercedes-Benz’s C63 AMG and, perhaps, BMW’s M6. From the Pacific Rim is the Nissan GT-R.

How does it look?
More muscular than the traditional, more sedate version of its “weakling” little brother A5, the RS 5 is packing a wallop and subtly lets you know. At first glance, it might get passed over as just the standard 5-range sleeper, but closer examination reveals the performance mesh grille with four rings logo that telegraphs this car’s Ingolstadt heritage.

New gaping air intakes, which seem to grab at least 30-percent more volume, minus the fog lamps of the standard model, occupy the lower bout of the front fascia. Audi touts their cooling ability for the brakes and S Tronic transmission.

Meanwhile, ground effect side skirts do their part to visually lower the car further than the 0.8-inch that comes standard as part of the RS 5 specification. Two visual giveaways make up the uniqueness at the rear: the new splitter with twin oval exhaust dumps below the bumper, and an automatically deploying spoiler that raises from the trailing edge of the decklid at 75 mph, or with the touch of a button at any speed.

The overall look is grown up boy-racer at its finest, and we love it.

And on the inside? 
We have long appreciated Audi’s interior executions. Always a step ahead of the competition, they reflect the epitome of what a modern day sports car’s interior should be. Recently the competition has stepped up their game, and soon, we hope Audi will, too.

The pair of sport seats are two of the most coddling we have experienced, offering generous bolstering and support for long stints behind the wheel. The great flat-bottomed steering wheel is alive here, as are all the controls and dials we have grown accustomed to. Rear seat legroom veers towards non-existent with long-legged passengers in front, so we would recommend the rear seat as a storage annex, instead. Trunk space measures up to 12.2 cubic feet, but can grow with the rear seats folded forward.

While all other operations are as we remember, Audi has managed to one up the competition with its available ($3,550) MMI Navigation Plus package. It’s all on-board: The sublime Bang & Olufsen sound system, MMI Navigation with voice control, and Audi connect with online services. Those include Google 3D mapping, and Internet access, making your car a secure, rolling T-Mobile Wi-Fi hotspot. The end result is rapid messaging and emails to a user’s smartphone, but we recommend turning the alerts off to avoid the Pavlov’s Dogs response that occurs every time a new message warning is sounded.

But does it go? 
The naturally-aspirated 4.2-liter V8 is a sultry beast that manages to sound totally intoxicating under full stress. Moveable sound flaps within the exhaust system open and close to decrease pressure buildup from within. But if this engine were all show, and no go, the story would end very quickly. Thankfully, this mill brings it. It sits like a cobra, calm and certain of its abilities, and just when needed, meaning when you squeeze the loud pedal, this engine rears back and snaps with a toxic vengeance.

Just dialing in the RS 5’s launch control will supply all the convincing any driver may need.

By the numbers, this hot-rod will click off a 0-60 mph sprint in 4.5 seconds and hits a terminal velocity of 174 mph. Thankfully there is none of that electronically-limited 155 mph top speed here.

Speaking of numbers, the EPA says to expect mileage in the range of 16/23 mpg with 18 combined.

The RS 5 displays a very direct steering feel, which along with its electronic torque vectoring provides some of the most tenacious grip we have encountered. We were surprised to find that the RS 5 is available in only one suspension configuration, owing to its standard springs and dampers. The ride may be harsh for some, but doesn’t beat you into submission in a manner like the Nissan GT-R does. We liked its firmness just fine.

The low profile tires transmit a fair amount of road noise that could limit your grand touring intentions.

A centerstack-mounted Drive Select button offers varying amounts of engine and transmission remapping, while readjusting the dynamic steering and sports differential. On the other end of the equation, the rev-matching downshifts prepare the drivetrain for a full-on assault of a turn’s apex, but sometimes do so with a certain degree of choppiness or drivetrain shock.

Overall, it’s just one more thing adding to the RS-5 visceral appeal.

Leftlane's bottom line:
Good things come to those who wait. And in the process, Audi’s RS lineup gains another member.

Available in the old country for several years now, the RS 5 ups the ante in North America by offering near supercar performance for a relatively un-supercar price point.

2013 Audi RS 5 base price, $68,900. As tested, $75,820.
Suzuka Grey Metallic, $475, MMI Navigation Plus, $3,550, Sport exhaust, $1,000, 20-inch wheels, $1,000, Destination, $895.

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

2013 Hyundai HCD-14 Genesis on Detroit motor show








          Detroit motor show: Hyundai HCD-14 Genesis

Shape of hyundai’s future luxury saloons revealed in a concept at the Detroit motor show


Hyundai’s concept car for the Detroit motor show, the HCD-14 Genesis, gives us a preview of what to expect from its future large cars.

The Californian-designed concept will shape the look of its BMW 5-series-rivalling Genesis and its Mercedes S-class competitor, the Equus.

The rear-drive HCD-14 has a much sleeker, sharper look than the firm’s current executive cars, with short overhangs and a coupé-like roofline. The back doors are rear-hinged, with large, brushed aluminium hinges supporting them. The car is powered by a 5.0-litre V8.

Hyundai’s US boss, John Krafick, said he is eager to show the “dynamic driving” of the HCD-14, a recognition of the relatively soft dynamics of the firm’s upper-end offerings.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

2013 Audi A5, A7 Sportback models make room for five




2013 Audi A5, A7 Sportback models make room for five


Audi Australia has announced a practicality boost for the Audi A5 Sportback and A7 Sportback models for 2013, making the versatility of a fifth seat now standard across both vehicle ranges.
The revised interior layout for both the Audi A5 Sportback and A7 Sportback headlines a list of updates for the 2013 model year. The A5 now includes a memory function for the driver’s seat and electric mirrors with heating, memory, auto dimming, reversing auto-dip and folding functions as standard. The A7 benefits from gains in engine performance, with the 3.0 TFSI petrol upped 8kW to 228kW and the 3.0 TDI diesel – now standard with an eight-speed tiptronic automatic transmission – bumped up 80Nm to 580Nm.
Prices for both variants of the Audi A7 Sportback have also been reduced for the new year with the diesel now starting at $135,750 (a saving of $7000) and the petrol at $143,800 ($3500 less).
Audi says the new pricing structure allows for the introduction of the A7 3.0 TDI Biturbo model – due to arrive next month accompanied by the Audi A6 3.0 TDI Biturbo - with an anticipated starting price around $160,000.
2013 Audi A5 and A7 Sportback manufacturer’s list prices:
  • A5 Sportback 1.8 TFSI – $66,900
  • A5 Sportback 2.0 TDI – $68,700
  • A5 Sportback 2.0 TFSI quattro S tronic – $83,200
  • A5 Sportback 2.0 TFSI quattro manual – $80,900
  • A5 Sportback 3.0 TDI quattro S tronic – $95,900
  • A5 Sportback 3.0 TFSI quattro S tronic – $100,300
  • A7 Sportback 3.0 TFSI quattro – $143,800 (-$3500)
  • A7 Sportback 3.0 TDI quattro – $135,750 (-$7000)

Friday, January 4, 2013

2013 Mercedes E-Class Coupe and Cabriolet facelifted






Official pictures of the revised Mercedes E-Class Coupe and Cabriolet

Following the reveal of the facelifted E-Class saloon and Estate last month, the Mercedes E-Class Coupe and Cabriolet have also received a fresh look and new technology.
Like the revised saloon, the E-Class Coupe and Cabriolet’s noses now feature two, single headlamp lenses rather than a pair of twin light units. However, the new LED-equipped lights do feature flowing daytime running lights which give the appearance of the quad headlights of the old model.
The new Coupe and Cabriolet also get new front bumpers with much more pronounced air intakes, while the rear of both feature revised LED tail-lights.
There’s a new rear bumper which has a wider diffuser, too, helping to give the car a more muscular stance, while the pontoon-style crease in the car’s flank that was ditched on the facelifted saloon is retained, and will become a trademark design feature reserved for the Coupe and Cabriolet models.
A three-tube instrument binnacle, analogue clock and redesigned air vents are transposed from the new saloon’s interior, and the gear selector on automatic models switches from the centre console to the steering column.
The drop-top car features the manufacturer's Aircap system as standard. Designed to reduce wind buffeting when the roof is lowered, the cap pops up from the top of the windscreen automatically when you hit 25mph, and lowers again when you slow below 9mph. Airscarf neck heaters built into the front seats are optional.
Both the Coupe and Cabriolet benefit from new safety kit derived from the next S-Class, including the stereo multi-purpose camera which enables the car to detect oncoming or crossing traffic, pedestrians and traffic signs.
An automatic city braking system is also fitted as standard, while the latest adaptive cruise control with steering assist to keep the car in its lane, and active high beam assist, which masks out part of the main beam of the LED headlights to prevent dazzling oncoming drivers, are on the options list.
The full UK engine range is yet to be confirmed, but two petrol and three diesel units will be offered. Mercedes’ new efficient four-cylinder BlueDIRECT petrol unit will also join the line-up.
Six-speed manual or 7G-Tronic auto gearboxes will be available when the car goes on sale in April. Prices will also be confirmed closer to the on-sale date.

Thursday, December 27, 2012

Toyota GT86 performance and engineering





There’s no overstatement in suggesting that we’ve been waiting years for this car. By that we don’t just mean enduring the interminable period of delays and introductions as journalists before finally getting our hands on a UK-spec Toyota GT86 (although we have had to do just that). We mean ‘we’ in a broader sense, as in the wait that every car enthusiast with modest resources has had to tolerate before a manufacturer summoned up the necessary gumption to build an authentic, low-weight, low-cost, compact sports car.

Despite boasting a heritage that contains the Celica, the Supra and the MR2, Toyota has passed through a period of recent history that has been so mundane that the GT86’s potential place close to our hearts seems almost to be a novelty. However, the manufacturer’s three stated criteria for the GT86 (which has been developed in conjunction with the Subaru BRZ) read like a purist’s manifesto: rear-wheel drive, no turbocharging, ordinary tyres. The objective, it gloriously affirms, was driver-focused fun. No further introduction is necessary.Delving into the detail typically reveals the devil in Toyota’s vast and intricate economies of scale, but in the GT86’s case the use of common parts shrunk to just nine per cent. If proof were required of the manufacturing giant’s enthusiasm for the project, it exists first and foremost in that figure.

The next number to consider is 86. Just a hat-tip to the AE86, yes? No. The ‘square’ 86mm dimension of both the bore and the stroke of the 197bhp 2.0-litre horizontally opposed four-cylinder engine previously featured in the in-line four that powered the Celica and MR2. Even the car’s prominent, chrome-tipped exhausts are 86mm in diameter.Toyota’s anally retentive pursuit of numeral significance may seem somewhat trivial, but it’s indicative of a wider effort to get everything on the new car just so.

Subaru’s boxer engine was selected because its configuration meant that it was compact and light, and could be mounted closer to the ground (and further back) for an ultra-low 460mm centre of gravity. A high-revving unit was specified so it was modified to allow it to spin to 7400rpm. Desperate to get the flick-of-the-wrist changes right on its reworked six-speed manual gearbox, Toyota went through five separate prototypes.

Underneath, nothing was permitted to muddy the virtues of the classic front-engined, rear-drive layout. Thinner, lighter body panels were used to keep the GT86’s burden under 1300kg. The weight has been distributed 53 per cent front, 47 per cent rear – not because it’s physically perfect, but because the engineers found that the slight front bias was ideal for the car’s handling balance.

Likewise, the suspension components, split between MacPherson struts at the front and double wishbones at the rear, have been mounted to take further advantage of the low centre of gravity, and were tuned to allow an intuitive degree of roll on turn-in. Finally, and encouragingly, there is a Torsen limited-slip differential to help apply a gung-ho degree of throttle on exit.A cursory, showroom-floor introduction to the GT86 will likely reveal that the car’s cabin, while offering a concerted step up from the BRZ’s positively skeletal innards, still lacks the plush, polished look that has come to define a European expectation of what sports cars should feel like inside. The Toyota is hard-edged and flinty to the touch, and it looks it, too. But there is a wonderful schematic rigour to the interior that only really becomes apparent once the model is in motion.

Most manufacturers talk a fine game when it comes to focusing their cockpits on the driver, but the GT86 is as nakedly purposeful as the tail-gunner seat in a B-52. Characterised by a sublime seating position — offering the lowest hip-point of any Toyota production vehicle — the car trades gun sights for a large tachometer, and then brilliantly orbits every other facet of the architecture around that eye line. The attention to a functional, instinctive level of detail — so often the subject of empty marketing rhetoric — is comprehensive and remarkably effective. The steering wheel is the smallest ever attached to a Toyota and a horizontal dashboard design has been used to help better communicate mid-bend roll posture. Soft knee pads have been built into the door trim and centre console to offer support under high lateral loads and there’s a centre line mark on the upper edge of the dashboard that can be seen reflected in the windscreen… The list goes on and on.

Not every facet is a success – the pedals have been positioned straight on but are too splayed to allow every size of right foot to heel and toe – but the overall effect is so intoxicating that an enthusiastic driver will likely feel compelled to keep his or her jaw clenched in unconscious tribute to the ardent and impeccable nature of it all.The Toyota GT86 falls into the same bracket as we grouped the Mercedes-Benz SLK 200 into last year. Both cars, though not fast, feel like they have a pleasing level of performance. They are slow enough to be able to enjoy on the road for more than just a second or two’s burst of throttle, but quick enough for necessary overtaking.

Therefore, don’t be put off by the fact that, on paper, it looks decidedly under-nourished compared with its price rivals and dispatches the 0-60mph sprint in ‘just’ 7.4sec.At about £25,000, a hot hatch like a Vauxhall Astra VXR or Renault Mégane RS will not only give you at least 60 extra bhp, but they also come to you more easily than in the Toyota, whose engine asks you to work it to 7000rpm for its peak 197bhp, and even to 6400rpm for its 151lb ft peak of torque. Truth be told, a £17,135 Renault Clio RS is a closer performance rival.

But to dismiss the Toyota on that basis would be a mistake. Its performance isn’t about numbers; in the same way that a Renault Clio RS is more fun than an Astra VXR, or in the same fashion that the Morgan 3 Wheeler we tested just a few weeks ago wormed its way into our hearts despite its modest poke, it’s about feel, communication and enjoyment.

Make no mistake: the GT86’s performance is worth working for. And you do have to work it. Throttle response is crisp, the gearshift is positive and precise (if not entirely notch free) and the flat four makes a solid rasp once you wind it up, as you have to, to make swift progress. All sports cars were thus once. We didn’t mind then, and we don’t mind now.

Thanks to its 1235kg tested weight, the GT86 stops pretty well, too, and it resisted fade comfortably during heavy runs on track in warm weather.All it takes is 50 metres – a jaunt out of a car park, just a short roll – to know that you’re in the presence of an exceptionally well sorted piece of kit with the Toyota GT86.

From the lowest of speeds, the GT86 rolls with a controlled comfort allowed by 215/45-section tyres and fine damping of its body. It steers with slickness, total linear accuracy and fine weighting. They all combine to make the GT86, ironically, one of the more relaxing sports cars to drive. Because everything happens as you expect, and each control responds just so to each input you make, it’s an extremely amiable companion, despite cabin noise levels that are much higher than average (forgivably, we suspect, because of a weight-saving reduction in sound proofing).

However, the really impressive stuff comes when you ask more questions of the chassis. During the GT86’s time with us, texts from testers telling the rest of us that they were “going to be late; taking the scenic route” became commonplace. The GT86’s slickness of steering, tightness of chassis control and general love of corners wowed us all.

Key to it are the modest tyres. That 215/45 R17 Michelin Primacys leave the GT86 looking under-tyred is a sign of the times. Yet at the track, the GT86 was still capable of holding 0.99g through corners on the dry handling circuit, on a steady throttle.

The fun comes on less steady throttle openings, mind you. Lean on the brakes on the way into a bend, get busier with the right pedal mid-corner, and the GT86 displays a willingness to adjust its line that makes every quiet roundabout a joy.

And therein lies the GT86’s real brilliance. It is at once poised, precise and agile yet also willing to indulge its driver with oversteer. The choice is yours. Every corner is a blank page, and the cars that give their drivers such options are rare things indeed.Is there no justice? If you buy a Toyota GT86 it’s predicted that you’ll lose more money over four years than if you’d bought the equivalent Audi TT. Console yourself, then, that at least the GT86 comes relatively well equipped, and that you’ll have a lot more fun in the meantime.

You’ll also, if driving carefully, be able to return more than 40mpg over a gentle touring route; a figure that, thanks to the absence of a turbocharger, drops only to 15mpg on a track day (which doesn’t sound great, but is considerably better than we’d expect from a 260bhp-ish turbo four).Overall, we returned a very respectable 30.2mpg and would expect most owners to better that. For the amount of entertainment you get, that’s a pretty good deal.

Lincoln Could Develop Mustang-Based Coupe


Lincoln Could Develop Mustang-Based Coupe

lincoln could develop mustang-based coupe picture
We have heard all kind of crazy stuff in the past few months, but this one is by far one of the craziest. It’s no secret that Lincoln is working to bring its fame back, but could the company indeed be planning a rear-wheel-drive sports coupe based on the Ford Mustang platform?
Apparently yes, at least according to FordInsideNews, who reports that Lincoln is preparing such a model as a "last chance" effort for the company. The model will be initially announced in late 2015 and it will be a 2016 or 2017 model year.
If the rumors are true, the model will feature a slightly larger wheelbase when compared to the Mustang and will be offered with a 2.9-liter EcoBoost V6 engine — a member of the company’s Nano engine family.
This new model is currently being developed only as a coupe, but rumors suggest that Lincoln is also considering a rear-wheel drive flagship sedan also based on the next-generation Mustang platform too.
No one is sure what name this coupe will carry, but a Mark Series name seems to be the right one.
We’ll keep an eye on this one, as Lincoln is inching closer to the do-or-die phase of its lifespan.

Friday, December 21, 2012

Toyota teases new saloon concept Named Furia Tease




Toyota teases new saloon concept  'Furia Tease'

2012 Lingenfelter Cadillac CTS-V Coupe


2012 Lingenfelter Cadillac CTS-V Coupe


Like Red Bull–quaffing preteens laying waste to digital innocents by the dozens in Grand Theft Auto, we’re being desensitized. It isn’t graphic violence we’re being hardened against, though; it’s gratuitous horsepower. Outputs that once stopped us in our tracks and slackened our jaws now merit an entitled shrug. Well, good. A Cadillac needs 556 hp to, you know, feel like a Cadillac. But 700 is one of those numbers that still widens our eyes and brings a silent “wow” to our lips. Seven hundred hp is a reality check.
Reality Checks and Real Checks
For a surprisingly small sum, the laboratories at Lingenfelter Performance Engineering will amplify the 6.2-liter LSA V-8 under the hood of the Cadillac CTS-V from the stock 556 hp to a reality-check 700. Just $11,470 gets you an increase in maximum supercharger boost from 9.0 psi to 14.5, a new camshaft, new fuel injectors, and overhauled heads. Included in the reconstructive surgery are a port and polish and new valves, springs, and retainers. Cadillac is unlikely to honor the warranty on cars that emerge from Lingenfelter’s shop in Decatur, Indiana, which is why the tuner covers the engine and its upgrades with a two-year/24,000-mile guarantee. (We want to be the guy putting 12,000 miles a year on his 700-hp Caddy.)
Although Lingenfelter lists the $1400 Corsa exhaust that was fitted to this siege engine as a separate option, go ahead and consider that a necessary expense. It’s so good we can’t share with you how good it is. Its assault on our audio equipment was so fierce that we couldn’t get a reasonable recording to share. Imagine the sound of a demon with a pair of V-8s for lungs sucking your eardrums through one of those large-volume straws you get at Burger King. (Easy, right?) At idle, you can practically hear individual combustion events, and the rollicking blub-blubblub-blub-blubwill already have the faint of heart reconsidering their decision to strap in. The way the LSA rocks the car at stoplights isn’t a T-Rex-walking-by, muscle-car shimmy, but it’s still a pleasant throwback.
Hold On to Something, We’re Going Hypersonic
But no worthy pilot drives a 700-hp car for its idle. That output isn’t merely a reality check, it’s a gut check. With the stock six-speed manual slotted into first gear, throttle inputs of more than 70 or so percent get earmarked for tire smoke, but once this raging machine gets traction, it reels in the horizon like few other cars on the road. The test results might be a bit misleading. The Lingenfelter’s 3.9-second 0-to-60 time is no better than the best we recorded from a stock CTS-coupe (with the six-speed automatic), and the 11.8-second quarter-mile bests that car by only 0.4 second. But the 7-mph increase in trap speed is telling. From 60 mph to 140, the Lingenfelter CTS-virtually mirrors the 10-mph increment times of one of the industry’s reigning accelerative champions, thePorsche 911 Turbo. A 700-hp tuned car matching Porsche’s factory effort might not seem like a big deal, but the CTS-is heavier by about 700 pounds. Besides, the Porsche costs a lot more, and it doesn’t sound at all like a demon.
From the driver’s seat, pushing the Lingenfelter feels abusive. The modified LSA makes so much power at 4000 rpm that the driver feels as if a shift should be imminent (it betters the stock CTS-V’s 556-hp peak from 4300 rpm on), but Lingenfelter’s changes to the engine raise its redline from the stock 6200 rpm to 6800. What the company hasn’t done is change the programming of the shift lights surrounding the tach—engineers tell us they’re looking into it—that start blinking as the normal car’s redline nears. So after being crushed, wide-eyed, into the seat for a mind-altering pull through each gear, you have to ignore the shift light for a prolonged period. (Compulsive feints toward the shifter at first blink are forgivable.)
Again, there are incredible numbers behind these awe-inspiring feats. From 2000 rpm until about 6600, this car puts out more torque than the stock does at its peak of 551 lb-ft at 3800 rpm. Lingenfelter’s LSA makes more than 600 lb-ft from about 2200 rpm to 5900 or so. And from about 2400 rpm all the way to 5000, it’s generating more than 650 lb-ft of grunt. This engine doesn’t so much have a torque curve as it has a straight line across the dyno chart—a very high, straight line.
Six Gears, Most of Them Extraneous
At highway speeds, downshifting will get you to higher speeds in a hurry, but it is entirely optional. Notice how the car is actually 1.4 seconds faster from 50 to 70 mph than it is from 30 to 50 (this test is performed with the car in top gear). The engine is just hitting its stride at 70. We don’t formally record results for higher speeds in the top-gear test, but the 70-to-90 and 90-to-110 times follow a similar pattern. Even in sixth, the pull of this engine is addictive. You don’t need cruise control for comfort; you need it because a lazy flex of the ankle could land you in the back seat of a police cruiser. It’s another reason to go with the Corsa exhaust. No change in engine load goes unnoticed.
As Hennessey did with the 707-hp CTS-sedan we recently tested, Lingenfelter left the chassis unmodified. Although the thought of throwing a 700-hp car into a sharp bend might seem imposing, the Lingenfelter CTS-is incredibly tractable. (We even drove it in the rain and didn’t die.) Cranking on the wheel while stomping on the accelerator at corner entry is not recommended unless you have an EMT fetish, but once the car settles in a curve, you can feed it surprising amounts of throttle alarmingly early without its getting out of sorts. On the skidpad, this car bested the stock coupe by 0.02 g, with a 0.92 performance. And the repeatability of the 156-foot stop from 70 to 0 mph is welcome, as the next corner will be coming up in a hurry.
The CTS-coupe’s base price of $64,535 and the cost of entry for the Lingenfelter bits mean you could be sitting behind the wheel of your own 700-hp Cadillac for $76,005. With a couple of extras installed at the factory, the car tested here sported a few of Lingenfelter’s add-ons, including the mean black anodized aluminum pedals and aforementioned exhaust system that represent an additional $1570 and shouldn’t be considered optional. Big-ticket items included a Lingenfelter carbon-fiber engine cover for $1195 and a laser-etched shock-tower brace for $350. Add in a carbon-fiber intake tube ($90), chrome Lingenfelter fender badges ($44) and license-plate frame ($35), and Brembo brake fluid ($36), and you’re looking at $80,915.
Horsepower: A Better Investment Than a Hyundai
That price could put you in a BMW 6-series, Porsche 911 (without turbos), or Jaguar XK, none of which is half as frightening or awe-inspiring as the Lingenfelter CTS-V. Or if you already have a CTS-V, the $11,470 cost of the Lingenfelter package could buy the kids a nice used car. But if it were our family, we’d get the kids a Huffy and spend that money on horsepower. Come to think of it, we’re starting to take our 556-hp long-term CTS-wagon for granted. We could probably use a reality check.View Photo Gallery